THE CONDITION OF INDIA: RAILWAYS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION


READER: You have deprived me of the consolation I used to have regarding peace in India.

EDITOR: If you or anybody has wrong understanding or misunderstanding of anything including peace in India or anywhere else in the world then it is your fault, what I can say that peace is misnomer; peace is achieved only when one is reduced in pieces, which is at death. What is achieved is harmony/rhythm and is to be desired in life.

On the same question reply of Mr. Gandhi is:
ANS:
I have merely given you my opinion on the religious aspect, but when I give you my views as to the poverty of India, you will perhaps begin to dislike me because what you and I have hitherto considered beneficial for India no longer appears to me to be so.

QST: What may that be?

ANS: Railways, lawyers and doctors have impoverished the country so much so that, if we do not wake up in time, we shall be ruined.

QST: I do now, indeed, fear that we are not likely to agree at all. You are attacking the very institutions which we have hitherto considered to be good.

ANS: It is necessary to exercise patience. The true inwardness of the evils of civilization you will understand with difficulty. Doctors assure us that a consumptive clings to life even when he is about to die. Consumption does not produce apparent hurt? it even produces a seductive colour about a patient’s face so as to induce the belief that all is well. Civilization is such a disease and we have to be very wary.

QST: Very well, then. I shall hear you on the railways.

ANS: It must be manifest to you that, but for the railways, the English could not have such a hold on India as they have. The railways, too, have spread the bubonic plague. Without them, the masses could not move from place to place. They are the carriers of plague germs. Formerly we had natural segregation. Railways have also increased the frequency of famines because, owing to facility of means of locomotion, people sell out their grain and it is sent to the dearest markets. People become careless and so the pressure of famine increases. Railways accentuate the evil nature of man. Bad men fulfill their evil designs with greater rapidity. The holy places of India have become unholy. Formerly, people went to these places with very great difficulty. Generally, therefore, only the real devotees visited such places. Nowadays rogues visit them in order to practise their roguery.

QST: You have given a one-sided account. Good men can visit these places as well as bad men. Why do they not take the fullest advantage of the railways?

ANS: Good travels at a snail’s pace? It can, therefore, have little to do with the railways. Those who want to do well are not selfish, they are not in a hurry, they know that to impregnate people with good requires a long time. But evil has wings. To build a house takes time. Its destruction takes none. So the railways can become a distributing agency for the evil one only. It may be a debatable matter whether railways spread famines, but it is beyond dispute that they propagate evil.

QST: Be that as it may, all the disadvantages of railways are more than counterbalanced by the fact that it is due to them that we see in India the new spirit of nationalism.

ANS: I hold this to be a mistake. The English have taught us that we were not one nation before and that it will require centuries before we become one nation. This is without foundation. We were one nation before they came to India. One thought inspired us. Our mode of life was the same. It was because we were one nation that they were able to establish one kingdom. Subsequently they divided us.

QST: This requires an explanation.

ANS: I do not wish to suggest that because we were one nation we had no differences, but it is submitted that our leading men travelled throughout India either on foot or in bullock carts. They learned one another’s languages and there was no aloofness between them. What do you think could have been the intention of those farseeing ancestors of ours who established Setubandha (Rameshwar) in the South, Jagannath in the East and Hardwar in the North as places of pilgrimage? You will admit they were no fools. They knew that worship of God could have been performed just as well at home. They taught us that those whose hearts were aglow with righteousness had the Ganges in their own homes. But they saw that India was one undivided land so made by Nature. They, therefore, argued that it must be one nation. Arguing thus, they established holy places in various parts of India, and fired the people with an idea of nationality in a manner unknown in other parts of the world. And we Indians are one as no two Englishmen are. Only you and I and others who consider ourselves civilized and superior persons imagine that we are many nations. It was after the advent of railways that we began to believe in distinctions, and you are at liberty now to say that it is through the railways that we are beginning to abolish distinctions. An opium-eater may argue the advantage of opium- eating from the fact that he began to understand the evil of the opium habit after having eaten it. I would ask you to consider well what I had said on the railways.

QST: I will gladly do so but one question occurs to me even now. You have described to me the India of the pre-Mahomedan period, but now we have Mahomedans, Parsis and Christians. How can they be one nation? Hindus and Mahomedans are old enemies. Our very proverbs prove it. Mahomedans turn to the West for worship, whilst Hindus turn to the East. The former look down on the Hindus as idolaters. The Hindus worship the cow, the Mahomedans kill her.

The Hindus believe in the doctrine of non-killing, the Mahomedans do not. We thus meet with differences at every step. How can India be one nation?

ANS: Your last question is a serious one and yet, on careful consideration, it will be found to be easy of solution. The question arises because of the presence of the railways, of the lawyers and of the doctors. We shall presently examine the last two. We have already considered the railways. I should, however, like to add that man is so made by nature as to require him to restrict his movements as far as his hands and feet will take him. If we did not rush about from place to place by means of railways and such other maddening conveniences, much of the confusion that arises would be obviated. Our difficulties are of our own creation. God set a limit to a man’s locomotive ambition in the construction of his body. Man immediately proceeded to discover means of overriding the limit. God gifted man with intellect that he might know his Maker. Man abused it so that he might forget his Maker. I am so constructed that I can only serve my immediate neighbours, but in my conceit I pretend to have discovered that I must with my body serve every individual in the Universe. In thus attempting the impossible, man comes in contact with different Natures, different religions, and is utterly confounded. According to this reasoning, it must be apparent to you that railways are a most dangerous institution. Owing to them, man has gone further away from his Maker.”

READER: Very well, you have given excerpts from Hind Swaraj, but what is your view, do you agree?

EDITOR: 1) Mr. Gandhi himself travelled a lot by train in India. If Mr. Gandhi feels ‘It must be manifest to you that, but for the railways, the English could not have such a hold on India as they have” then I can just add that by travelling in railway Mr. Gandhi has become an instrument in the hands of English to stabilize the rule of British in India. Mr. Gandhi first by criticizing railway than by travelling in the railway has inherently provided more than required publicity to railway and British, which made them success like what is being presently done by Bollywood/ Hollywood i.e. criticize the film in print and visual media and film will be super-duper, such is the case with Mr. Gandhi and British rule in India. It appears that Mr. Gandhi knowingly or unknowingly worked as their brand ambassador.

Generally good travel only after bad provokes it to travel, and considered to be very slow, but certainly good people have to take full advantage of communication methods available, one to check the evil forces and secondly to encourage good forces. Good people have to find out the basic method of communication so that their, fear and phobia, worries and botheration evaporates and their view and feeling reaches to the larger mankind.

India was one with more or less same culture throughout the land. It was after the advent of faster communication that we hear more of differences than underlying unity. Mind travels very fast, hence in Bharat they say listen to the mind and accept of the heart. Generally all faster communication makes life miserable and death difficult.

Only roads lead to nowhere; for a country to develop as a whole and as a single unit, two most important factors of connectivity, audio/ video and transport communication are considered essential. With the growth of communication methods-flooding of information, flooding of Virus and consequential system corruption/illness has risen to many folds. Lawyer, so called judges, doctors and so called diagnostic methods, mobile/multimedia it’s so called networking signals and consequential radiation, satellites/space shuttle, it’s so called strength for space war are becoming bigger disease and threat.

Unhappiness is then and there, happiness is here and now. Faster communication is requirement of the unhappy lot, the busy lot who feels happiness will be then when we will have money of entire world in our coffer. With faster communication one clings to communicate even when one is at crematorium.

Silence between two indicates deep love, whereas noise indicates appearance of clash/fight/war, rhythm indicates wholesome life whereas faster communication indicates appearance of wider differences/disturbance.


YOUR-VIEWS-SUGGESTION